4.7 Article

Additional chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia-positive clone: adverse prognostic influence on frontline imatinib therapy: a GIMEMA Working Party on CML analysis

期刊

BLOOD
卷 120, 期 4, 页码 761-767

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-10-384651

关键词

-

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana contro le Leucemie
  2. i linfomi e i mielomi Bologna (BolognaAIL)
  3. Progetti di Ricerca di Interesse Nazionale [PRIN2007]
  4. University of Bologna
  5. Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna
  6. European LeukemiaNet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) in Philadelphia-positive cells have been reported in similar to 5% of patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). Few studies addressing the prognostic significance of baseline ACAs in patients treated with imatinib have been published previously. The European Leukemia Net recommendations suggest that the presence of ACAs at diagnosis is a warning for patients in early CP, but there is not much information about their outcome after therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. To investigate the role of ACAs in early CP CML patients treated with imatinib mesylate, we performed an analysis in a large series of 559 patients enrolled in 3 prospective trials of the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto Working Party on CML: 378 patients were evaluable and ACAs occurred in 21 patients (5.6%). The overall cytogenetic and molecular response rates were significantly lower and the time to response was significantly longer in patients with ACAs. The long-term outcome of patients with ACAs was inferior, but the differences were not significant. The prognostic significance of each specific cytogenetic abnormality was not assessable. Therefore, we confirm that ACAs constitute an adverse prognostic factor in CML patients treated with imatinib as frontline therapy. This study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00514488 and NCT00510926. (Blood. 2012; 120(4):761-767)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据