4.7 Article

An insertional mutagenesis screen identifies genes that cooperate with Mll-AF9 in a murine leukemogenesis model

期刊

BLOOD
卷 119, 期 19, 页码 4512-4523

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-281428

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [U01 CA84221, F32 CA106192, K01 CA122183]
  2. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of America [LLS 7019-04]
  3. University of Minnesota Cancer Biology training grant [CA009138]
  4. Cancer Research UK
  5. TheWellcome Trust
  6. American Cancer Society [PF-05-153-01]
  7. Cancer Research UK [13031] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients with a t(9;11) translocation (MLL-AF9) develop acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and while in mice the expression of this fusion oncogene also results in the development of myeloid leukemia, it is with long latency. To identify mutations that cooperate with Mll-AF9, we infected neonatal wild-type (WT) or Mll-AF9 mice with a murine leukemia virus (MuLV). MuLV-infected Mll-AF9 mice succumbed to disease significantly faster than controls presenting predominantly with myeloid leukemia while infected WT animals developed predominantly lymphoid leukemia. We identified 88 candidate cancer genes near common sites of proviral insertion. Analysis of transcript levels revealed significantly elevated expression of Mn1, and a trend toward increased expression of Bcl11a and Fosb in Mll-AF9 murine leukemia samples with proviral insertions proximal to these genes. Accordingly, FOSB and BCL11A were also overexpressed in human AML harboring MLL gene translocations. FOSB was revealed to be essential for growth in mouse and human myeloid leukemia cells using shRNA lentiviral vectors in vitro. Importantly, MN1 cooperated with Mll-AF9 in leukemogenesis in an in vivo BM viral transduction and transplantation assay. Together, our data identified genes that define transcription factor networks and important genetic pathways acting during progression of leukemia induced by MLL fusion oncogenes. (Blood. 2012; 119(19): 4512-4523)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据