4.7 Article

RNAi screen of the druggable genome identifies modulators of proteasome inhibitor sensitivity in myeloma including CDK5

期刊

BLOOD
卷 117, 期 14, 页码 3847-3857

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-304022

关键词

-

资金

  1. Mayo Clinic
  2. National Institutes of Health [RO1CA129009-03, RO1CA133115-02, 5P5OCA100707-08]
  3. Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation
  4. American Society of Hematology Scholar Award Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation
  5. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
  6. Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium Genomics Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular target(s) cooperating with proteasome inhibition in multiple myeloma (MM) remain unknown. We therefore measured proliferation in MM cells transfected with 13 984 small interfering RNAs in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of bortezomib. We identified 37 genes, which when silenced, are not directly cytotoxic but do synergistically potentiate the growth inhibitory effects of bortezomib. To focus on bortezomib sensitizers, genes that also sensitized MM to melphalan were excluded. When suppressed, the strongest bortezomib sensitizers were the proteasome subunits PSMA5, PSMB2, PSMB3, and PSMB7 providing internal validation, but others included BAZ1B, CDK5, CDC42SE2, MDM4, NME7, RAB8B, TFE3, TNFAIP3, TNK1, TOP1, VAMP2, and YY1. The strongest hit CDK5 also featured prominently in pathway analysis of primary screen data. Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5) is expressed at high levels in MM and neural tissues with relatively low expression in other organs. Viral shRNA knockdown of CDK5 consistently sensitized 5 genetically variable MM cell lines to proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib and carfilzomib). Small-molecule CDK5 inhibitors were demonstrated to synergize with bortezomib to induce cytotoxicity of primary myeloma cells and myeloma cell lines. CDK5 regulation of proteasome subunit PSMB5 was identified as a probable route to sensitization. (Blood. 2011;117(14):3847-3857)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据