4.7 Article

β2-glycoprotein-1 autoantibodies from patients with antiphospholipid syndrome are sufficient to potentiate arterial thrombus formation in a mouse model

期刊

BLOOD
卷 117, 期 12, 页码 3453-3459

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-300715

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL092125] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antiphospholipid syndrome is characterized by thrombosis, recurrent fetal loss, and the presence of the lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, or anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein-1 (anti-beta(2)-GP1) antibodies. Although anti-beta(2)-GP1 antibodies have been documented as a biomarker for diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome, their direct role in the pathogenesis of thrombosis is unknown. We have demonstrated using intravital microscopy that anti-beta(2)-GP1 autoantibodies purified from the sera of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome complicated by thrombosis greatly amplify thrombus size after laser-induced vessel wall injury in live mice. Anti-beta(2)-GP1 autoantibodies from 3 patients with antiphospholipid syndrome were affinity-purified using human beta(2)-GP1 bound to agarose. The effects of purified anti-beta(2)GP1 IgG autoantibodies, of anti-beta(2)-GP1-depleted IgG, and of IgG from normal human sera on thrombus formation were measured in mice after arterial injury in the cremaster muscle. Before injury, purified anti-beta(2)-GP1 IgG autoantibodies, anti-beta(2)-GP1 antibody-depleted IgG, or IgG from normal human sera were infused. Increasing amounts of purified anti-beta(2)-GP1 autoantibodies increased thrombus size in a dose-dependent manner, whereas neither anti-beta(2)-GP1 antibody-depleted IgG nor IgG from normal serum affected thrombus size. These results indicate that anti-beta(2)-GP1 IgG autoantibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome patient sera are not only a marker of antiphospholipid syndrome but are directly involved in the pathogenesis of thrombosis. (Blood. 2011; 117(12): 3453-3459)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据