4.7 Article

Enforced expression of miR-125b affects myelopoiesis by targeting multiple signaling pathways

期刊

BLOOD
卷 117, 期 16, 页码 4338-4348

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-289058

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG excellence initiative [SFB 566]
  2. DFG [KR2320/2-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, noncoding RNAs that regulate gene expression by sequence-specific targeting of multiple mRNAs. Although lineage-, maturation-, and disease-specific miRNA-expression has been described, miRNA-dependent phenotypes and miRNA-regulated signaling in hematopoietic cells are largely unknown. Combining functional genomics, biochemical analysis, and unbiased and hypothesis-driven miRNA target prediction, we show that lentivirally over-expressed miR-125b blocks G-CSF-induced granulocytic differentiation and enables G-CSF-dependent proliferation of murine 32D cells. In primary lineage-negative cells, miR-125b over-expression enhances colony-formation in vitro and promotes myelopoiesis in mouse bone marrow chimeras. We identified Stat3 and confirmed Bak1 as miR-125b target genes with approximately 30% and 50% reduction in protein expression, respectively. However, gene-specific RNAi reveals that this reduction, alone and in combination, is not sufficient to block G-CSF-dependent differentiation. STAT3 protein expression, DNA-binding, and transcriptional activity but not induction of tyrosine-phosphorylation and nuclear translocation are reduced upon enforced miR-125b expression, indicating miR-125b-mediated reduction of one or more STAT3 cofactors. Indeed, we identified c-Jun and Jund as potential miR-125b targets and demonstrated reduced protein expression in 32D/miR-125b cells. Interestingly, gene-specific silencing of JUND but not c-JUN partially mimics the miR-125b over-expression phenotype. These data demonstrate coordinated regulation of several signaling pathways by miR-125b linked to distinct phenotypes in myeloid cells. (Blood. 2011; 117(16): 4338-4348)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据