4.7 Article

Chuvash polycythemia VHLR200W mutation is associated with down-regulation of hepcidin expression

期刊

BLOOD
卷 118, 期 19, 页码 5278-5282

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-03-345512

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [UH1-HL03679-05]
  2. Office of Research on Minority Health
  3. Howard University General Clinical Research Center [MO1-RR10284]
  4. National Institutes of Health [R01HL079912-01, R01HL50077-14]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypoxia is known to reduce the expression of hepcidin, the master regulator of iron metabolism. However, it is not clear whether this response is primarily related to increased erythropoiesis driven by hypoxically stimulated erythropoietin or to a more direct effect of hypoxia on hepcidin expression. The germline loss-of-function VHLR200W mutation is common in Chuvashia, Russia, and also occurs elsewhere. VHLR200W homozygotes have elevated hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) and HIF-2 alpha levels, increased red cell mass, propensity to thrombosis, and early mortality. Ninety VHLR200W homozygotes and 52 controls with normal VHL alleles from Chuvashia, Russia, were studied under basal circumstances. In univariate analyses, serum hepcidin concentration was correlated positively with serum ferritin concentration and negatively with homozygosity for VHLR200W. After adjustment for serum erythropoietin and ferritin concentrations by multiple linear regression, the geometric mean (95% confidence interval of mean) hepcidin concentration was 8.1 (6.3-10.5) ng/mL in VHLR200W homozygotes versus 26.9 (18.6-38.0) ng/mL in controls (P < .001). In contrast, a significant independent relationship of serum erythropoietin, hemoglobin, or RBC count with hepcidin was not observed. In conclusion, up-regulation of the hypoxic response leads to decreased expression of hepcidin that may be independent of increased erythropoietin levels and increased RBC counts. (Blood. 2011; 118(19): 5278-5282)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据