4.7 Article

Differences in clinical outcomes after 2009 influenza A/H1N1 and seasonal influenza among hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

期刊

BLOOD
卷 117, 期 19, 页码 5050-5056

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-11-319186

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA18029, CA15704, HL93294]
  2. Sanofi Pasteur Vaccines
  3. Novartis
  4. MedImmune, Inc
  5. Adamas, Inc.
  6. Roche Pharmaceuticals
  7. Glaxo-Smith-Kline
  8. Adamas Pharmaceuticals
  9. Office for Preparedness and Response, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is not known whether pandemic 2009 influenza A/H1N1 (2009 H1N1) leads to more serious disease than seasonal influenza in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. In a retrospective study in HCT recipients with virologically proven influenza virus infection, a total of 161 HCT recipients (18 2009 H1N1, 103 seasonal influenza A, and 40 seasonal influenza B) were analyzed. In multivariable analyses, more patients with 2009 H1N1 had lower respiratory tract disease (LRD), hypoxemia, and prolonged viral shedding compared with seasonal influenza A. Seasonal influenza A and B outcomes were similar. There was no difference in overall and influenza-associated mortality among influenza virus types. Both early and delayed administration of antiviral therapy was shown to be beneficial in terms of decreased rates of development of LRD, although earlier intervention appeared to be more effective. Profound lymphopenia and lack of early antiviral therapy were associated significantly with LRD, hypoxemia, and death. High-dose corticosteroid treatment (>= 1 mg/kg) given at the time of influenza diagnosis was associated with a reduced risk for mechanical ventilation. Thus, our data suggest that infection with 2009 influenza A/H1N1 resulted in more severe respiratory disease in HCT recipients compared with seasonal influenza. (Blood. 2011; 117(19): 5050-5056)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据