4.7 Article

Intensive strategy to prevent CMV disease in seropositive umbilical cord blood transplant recipients

期刊

BLOOD
卷 118, 期 20, 页码 5689-5696

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-361618

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [K23HL077446, R24HL74445, 1RC2HL101844, K23HL096831, 1K24HL093294, CA18029, CA15704]
  2. ASBMT/Viropharma
  3. Infectious Diseases Society
  4. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation [35-07]
  5. Viropharma Inc
  6. Chimerix, Inc.
  7. GlaxoSmithKline
  8. Roche Laboratories
  9. Vical Inc
  10. Astellas
  11. Boehringer Ingelheim
  12. Novartis
  13. Roche/Genentech

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seropositive umbilical cord blood transplant (UCBT) recipients are at increased risk for CMV complications. To reduce CMV complications, we adopted an intensive strategy that consisted of ganciclovir administered before transplantation (5 mg/kg intravenously daily from day -8 to day -2), high-dose acyclovir (2 g, 3 times daily) after transplantation, and biweekly monitoring with a serum CMV PCR for preemptive therapy. Hazard rates and cumulative incidence of CMV complications along with days treated were compared in high-risk CMV seropositive UCBT recipients who received the intensive strategy and a historical cohort who received a standard strategy. Of 72 seropositive patients, 29 (40%) received standard prophylaxis and 43 (60%) the new intensive approach. The hazard rate (HR) for CMV reactivation was lower for patients receiving the intensive strategy (HR 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.48; P < .001) and led to fewer cases of CMV disease by 1 year (HR 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.53; P = .006). In patients who reactivated, the intensive strategy also led to fewer days on CMV-specific antiviral therapy (median 42% [interquartile range 21-63] vs 70% [ interquartile range 54-83], P < .001). Use of an intensive CMV prevention strategy in high-risk CMVseropositive UCBT recipients results in a significant decrease in CMV reactivation and disease. (Blood. 2011; 118(20): 5689-5696)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据