4.7 Article

Ribosomal protein gene deletions in Diamond-Blackfan anemia

期刊

BLOOD
卷 118, 期 26, 页码 6943-6951

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-375170

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [K08HL092224, R01HL079571]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute DNA Resequencing and Genotyping Service [R109 MOHLKE]
  3. Feinstein Institute for Medical Research General Clinical Research Center [M01RR018535]
  4. National Human Genome Research Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA) is a congenital BM failure syndrome characterized by hypoproliferative anemia, associated physical abnormalities, and a predisposition to cancer. Perturbations of the ribosome appear to be critically important in DBA; alterations in 9 different ribosomal protein genes have been identified in multiple unrelated families, along with rarer abnormalities of additional ribosomal proteins. However, at present, only 50% to 60% of patients have an identifiable genetic lesion by ribosomal protein gene sequencing. Using genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism array to evaluate for regions of recurrent copy variation, we identified deletions at known DBA-related ribosomal protein gene loci in 17% (9 of 51) of patients without an identifiable mutation, including RPS19, RPS17, RPS26, and RPL35A. No recurrent regions of copy variation at novel loci were identified. Because RPS17 is a duplicated gene with 4 copies in a diploid genome, we demonstrate haploinsufficient RPS17 expression and a small subunit ribosomal RNA processing abnormality in patients harboring RPS17 deletions. Finally, we report the novel identification of variable mosaic loss involving known DBA gene regions in 3 patients from 2 kindreds. These data suggest that ribosomal protein gene deletion is more common than previously suspected and should be considered a component of the initial genetic evaluation in cases of suspected DBA. (Blood. 2011;118(26):6943-6951)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据