4.7 Article

Pretreatment with phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) inhibitor SF1670 augments the efficacy of granulocyte transfusion in a clinically relevant mouse model

期刊

BLOOD
卷 117, 期 24, 页码 6702-6713

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-309864

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL085100, AI076471, HL092020, GM076084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The clinical outcome of granulocyte transfusion therapy is often hampered by short ex vivo shelf life, inefficiency of recruitment to sites of inflammation, and poor pathogen-killing capability of transplanted neutrophils. Here, using a recently developed mouse granulocyte transfusion model, we revealed that the efficacy of granulocyte transfusion can be significantly increased by elevating intracellular phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)trisphosphate signaling with a specific phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) inhibitor SF1670. Neutrophils treated with SF1670 were much sensitive to chemoattractant stimulation. Neutrophil functions, such as phagocytosis, oxidative burst, polarization, and chemotaxis, were augmented after SF1670 treatment. The recruitment of SF1670-pretreated transfused neutrophils to the inflamed peritoneal cavity and lungs was significantly elevated. In addition, transfusion with SF1670-treated neutrophils led to augmented bacteria-killing capability (decreased bacterial burden) in neutropenic recipient mice in both peritonitis and bacterial pneumonia. Consequently, this alleviated the severity of and decreased the mortality of neutropenia-related pneumonia. Together, these observations demonstrate that the innate immune responses can be enhanced and the severity of neutropenia-related infection can be alleviated by augmenting phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate in transfused neutrophils with PTEN inhibitor SF1670, providing a therapeutic strategy for improving the efficacy of granulocyte transfusion. (Blood. 2011;117(24):6702-6713)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据