4.7 Article

Novel protein ADTRP regulates TFPI expression and function in human endothelial cells in normal conditions and in response to androgen

期刊

BLOOD
卷 118, 期 16, 页码 4463-4471

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-05-355370

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Heart Association [0615595Z]
  2. American Cancer Society (ACS-IRG) [IRG-05-066-01]
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM037704, R01 GM097747, 5P20RR020143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thrombosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) represent major causes of morbidity and mortality. Low androgen correlates with higher incidence of CVD/thrombosis. Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor (TFPI) is the major inhibitor of tissue factor-factor VIIa (TF-FVIIa)-dependent FXa generation. Because endothelial cell (EC) dysfunction leading to vascular disease correlates with low EC-associated TFPI, we sought to identify mechanisms that regulate the natural expression of TFPI. Data mining of NCBI's GEO microarrays revealed strong coexpression between TFPI and the uncharacterized protein encoded by C6ORF105, which is predicted to be multispan, palmitoylated and androgen-responsive. We demonstrate that this protein regulates both the native and androgen-enhanced TFPI expression and activity in cultured ECs, and we named it androgen-dependent TFPI-regulating protein (ADTRP). We confirm ADTRP expression and colocalization with TFPI and caveolin-1 in ECs. ADTRP-shRNA reduces, while over-expression of ADTRP enhances, TFPI mRNA and activity and the colocalization of TF-FVIIa-FXa-TFPI with caveolin-1. Imaging and Triton X-114-extraction confirm TFPI and ADTRP association with lipid rafts/caveolae. Dihydrotestosterone up-regulates TFPI and ADTRP expression, and increases FXa inhibition by TFPI in an ADTRP- and caveolin-1-dependent manner. We conclude that the ADTRP-dependent upregulation of TFPI expression and activity by androgen represents a novel mechanism of increasing the anticoagulant protection of the endothelium. (Blood. 2011;118(16):4463-4471)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据