4.7 Article

Erg is required for self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells during stress hematopoiesis in mice

期刊

BLOOD
卷 118, 期 9, 页码 2454-2461

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-03-344739

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [461219, 516726, 361646]
  2. Australian Research Council
  3. Sylvia and Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation
  4. Cancer Council, Victoria
  5. Sydney Parker Smith Postdoctoral Research Fellowship
  6. Australian Department of Education, Science and Training
  7. Australian Stem Cell Center
  8. Haematology Society of Australia and New Zealand/AMGEN
  9. Australian Cancer Research Fund
  10. Victorian State Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are rare residents of the bone marrow responsible for the lifelong production of blood cells. Regulation of the balance between HSC self-renewal and differentiation is central to hematopoiesis, allowing precisely regulated generation of mature blood cells at steady state and expanded production at times of rapid need, as well as maintaining ongoing stem cell capacity. Erg, a member of the Ets family of transcription factors, is deregulated in cancers; and although Erg is known to be required for regulation of adult HSCs, its precise role has not been defined. We show here that, although heterozygosity for functional Erg is sufficient for adequate steady-state HSC maintenance, Erg(+/Mld2) mutant mice exhibit impaired HSC self-renewal after bone marrow transplantation or during recovery from myelotoxic stress. Moreover, although mice functionally compromised for either Erg or Mpl, the receptor for thrombopoietin, a key regulator of HSC quiescence, maintained sufficient HSC activity to sustain hematopoiesis, Mpl(-/) (-)Erg(+/Mld2) compound mutant mice displayed exacerbated stem cell deficiencies and bone marrow failure. Thus, Erg is a critical regulator of adult HSCs, essential for maintaining self-renewal at times of high HSC cycling. (Blood. 2011;118(9):2454-2461)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据