4.7 Article

Heterozygous ITGA2B R995W mutation inducing constitutive activation of the αIIbβ3 receptor affects proplatelet formation and causes congenital macrothrombocytopenia

期刊

BLOOD
卷 117, 期 20, 页码 5479-5484

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-323691

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Academic Frontier Project in Japan
  3. Mitsubishi Pharma Research Foundation
  4. 24th General Assembly of the Japanese Association of Medical Sciences Promotion Fund
  5. Mother and Child Health Foundation
  6. National Hospital Organization
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21591231, 23659514, 21390321, 23659533, 21300160, 23591429, 21591242] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Congenital macrothrombocytopenia is a genetically heterogeneous group of rare disorders. alpha IIb beta 3 has not been implicated in these conditions. We identified a novel, conserved heterozygous ITGA2B R995W mutation in 4 unrelated families. The surface expression of platelet alpha IIb beta 3 was decreased to 50% to 70% of control. There was spontaneous PAC-1 and fibrinogen binding to resting platelets without CD62p expression. The activation state of alpha IIb beta 3 in 293T cells was higher for alpha IIb-W995 than for beta 3-H723 but was weaker than for beta 3-N562. FAK was spontaneously phosphorylated in alpha IIb-W995/beta 3-transfected 293T cells. These results indicate that alpha IIb-W995/beta 3 has a constitutive, activated conformation but does not induce platelet activation. alpha IIb-W995/beta 3-transfected CHO cells developed membrane ruffling and abnormal cytoplasmic protrusions. The increased size and decreased number of proplatelet tips in alpha IIb-W995/beta 3-transduced mouse fetal liver-derived megakaryocytes indicate defective proplatelet formation. We propose that activating mutations in ITGA2B and ITGB3 represent the etiology of a subset of congenital macrothrombocytopenias. (Blood. 2011;117(20):5479-5484)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据