4.7 Article

The munc13-4-rab27 complex is specifically required for tethering secretory lysosomes at the plasma membrane

期刊

BLOOD
卷 118, 期 6, 页码 1570-1578

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-339523

关键词

-

资金

  1. Dutch Cancer Society
  2. French National Research Agency (ANR)
  3. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM)
  4. l'Association de Recherche contre le cancer (ARC)
  5. Imagine Foundation
  6. Netherlands Organization for Medical Research (ZonMW)
  7. Inserm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) kill target cells through the polarized release of lytic molecules from secretory lysosomes. Loss of munc13-4 function inhibits this process and causes familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis type 3 (FHL3). munc13-4 binds rab27a, but the necessity of the complex remains enigmatic, because studies in knockout models suggest separate functions. In the present study, we describe a noncanonical rab27a-binding motif in the N-terminus of munc13-4. Point mutants in this sequence have severely impaired rab27a binding, allowing dissection of rab27a requirements in munc13-4 function. The munc13-4-rab27a complex is not needed for secretory lysosome maturation, as shown by complementation in CTLs from FHL3 patients and in a mast cell line silenced for munc13-4. In contrast, fusion of secretory lysosomes with, and content release at the plasma membrane during degranulation, strictly required the munc13-4-rab27a complex. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy imaging revealed that the complex corrals motile secretory lysosomes beneath the plasma membrane during degranulation and controls their docking. The propensity to stall motility of secretory lysosomes is lost in cells expressing munc13-4 point mutants that do not bind rab27. In summary, these results uncovered a mechanism for tethering secretory lysosomes to the plasma membrane that is essential for degranulation in immune cells. (Blood. 2011;118(6):1570-1578)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据