4.7 Article

A small molecule screening strategy with validation on human leukemia stem cells uncovers the therapeutic efficacy of kinetin riboside

期刊

BLOOD
卷 119, 期 5, 页码 1200-1207

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-330019

关键词

-

资金

  1. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
  2. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  3. Stem Cell Network of Canadian National Centres of Excellence
  4. Canadian Cancer Society
  5. Terry Fox Foundation
  6. Genome Canada through the Ontario Genomics Institute
  7. Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
  8. province of Ontario
  9. Canada Research Chair
  10. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (OMOHLTC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene regulatory networks that govern hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and leukemia-initiating cells (L-ICs) are deeply entangled. Thus, the discovery of compounds that target L-ICs while sparing HSC is an attractive but difficult endeavor. Presently, most screening approaches fail to counter-screen compounds against normal hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). Here, we present a multistep in vitro and in vivo approach to identify compounds that can target L-ICs in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A high-throughput screen of 4000 compounds on novel leukemia cell lines derived from human experimental leukemogenesis models yielded 80 hits, of which 10 were less toxic to HSPC. We characterized a single compound, kinetin riboside (KR), on AML L-ICs and HSPCs. KR demonstrated comparable efficacy to standard therapies against blast cells in 63 primary leukemias. In vitro, KR targeted the L-IC-enriched CD34(+)CD38(-) AML fraction, while sparing HSPC-enriched fractions, although these effects were mitigated on HSC assayed in vivo. KR eliminated L-ICs in 2 of 4 primary AML samples when assayed in vivo and highlights the importance of in vivo L-IC and HSC assays to measure function. Overall, we provide a novel approach to screen large drug libraries for the discovery of anti-L-IC compounds for human leukemias. (Blood. 2012;119(5):1200-1207)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据