4.7 Article

Platelet transcriptional profile and protein expression in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: up-regulation of the type I interferon system is strongly associated with vascular disease

期刊

BLOOD
卷 116, 期 11, 页码 1951-1957

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-274605

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Medical Faculty at Lund University
  3. Alfred Osterlund's Foundation
  4. Crafoord Foundation
  5. Greta and Johan Kock's Foundation
  6. King Gustaf V's 80th Birthday Foundation
  7. Lund University Hospital
  8. Swedish Rheumatism Association
  9. Swedish Society of Medicine
  10. Foundation of the National Board of Health and Welfare

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have a markedly increased risk to develop cardiovascular disease, and traditional cardiovascular risk factors fail to account for this increased risk. We used microarray to probe the platelet transcriptome in patients with SLE and healthy controls, and the gene and protein expression of a subset of differentially expressed genes was further investigated and correlated to platelet activation status. Real-time PCR was used to confirm a type I interferon (IFN) gene signature in patients with SLE, and the IFN-regulated proteins PRKRA, IFITM1 and CD69 (P<.0001) were found to be up-regulated in platelets from SLE patients compared with healthy volunteers. Notably, patients with a history of vascular disease had increased expression of type I IFN-regulated proteins as well as more activated platelets compared with patients without vascular disease. We suggest that interferogenic immune complexes stimulate production of IFN alpha that up-regulates the megakaryocytic type I IFN-regulated genes and proteins. This could affect platelet activation and contribute to development of vascular disease in SLE. In addition, platelets with type I IFN signature could be a novel marker for vascular disease in SLE. (Blood. 2010; 116(11): 1951-1957)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据