4.7 Article

SIRT1 deficiency compromises mouse embryonic stem cell hematopoietic differentiation, and embryonic and adult hematopoiesis in the mouse

期刊

BLOOD
卷 117, 期 2, 页码 440-450

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-273011

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Public Health Service [RO1 HL56416, RO1 HL67384]
  2. National Institutes of Health [PO1 HL53586, R01 AI080759]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SIRT1 is a founding member of a sirtuin family of 7 proteins and histone deacetylases. It is involved in cellular resistance to stress, metabolism, differentiation, aging, and tumor suppression. SIRT1(-/-) mice demonstrate embryonic and postnatal development defects. We examined hematopoietic and endothelial cell differentiation of SIRT1(-/-) mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) in vitro, and hematopoietic progenitors in SIRT1(-/-), (+/-), and (-/-) mice. SIRT1(-/-) ESCs formed fewer mature blast cell colonies. Replated SIRT1(-/-) blast colony-forming cells demonstrated defective hematopoietic potential. Endothelial cell production was unaltered, but there were defects in formation of a primitive vascular network from SIRT1(-/-) derived embryoid bodies. Development of primitive and definitive progenitors derived from SIRT1(-/-) ESCs were also delayed and/or defective. Differentiation delay/defects were associated with delayed capacity to switch off Oct4, Nanog and Fgf5 expression, decreased beta-H1 globin, beta-major globin, and Scl gene expression, and reduced activation of Erk1/2. Ectopic expression of SIRT1 rescued SIRT1(-/-) ESC differentiation deficiencies. SIRT1(-/-) yolk sacs manifested fewer primitive erythroid precursors. SIRT1(-/-) and SIRT1(-/-) adult marrow had decreased numbers and cycling of hematopoietic progenitors, effects more apparent at 5%, than at 20%, oxygen tension, and these progenitors survived less well in vitro under conditions of delayed growth factor addition. This suggests a role for SIRT1 in ESC differentiation and mouse hematopoiesis. (Blood. 2011; 117(2):440-450)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据