4.7 Article

Glycosidic Tn-based vaccines targeting dermal dendritic cells favor germinal center B-cell development and potent antibody response in the absence of adjuvant

期刊

BLOOD
卷 116, 期 18, 页码 3526-3536

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-279133

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institut Pasteur [PIC-PTR 278, PTR 260]
  2. Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer
  3. Institut National du Cancer
  4. MGEN Union
  5. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  6. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR) [R09111JS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In vivo targeting of C-type lectin receptors is an effective strategy for increasing antigen uptake and presentation by dendritic cells (DCs). To induce efficient immune response, glycosylated tumor-associated Tn antigens were used to target DCs through binding to macrophage galactose-type lectin (MGL). The capacity of Tn-glycosylated antigens-and the multiple antigenic glycopeptide Tn3 therapeutic candidate vaccine-to target mouse and human MGL(+) DCs are demonstrated, especially regarding dermal DCs. In mice, MGL(+) CD103(-) dermal DCs efficiently captured and processed glycosylated Tn antigen in vivo, inducing a potent major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-restricted T-cell response. Intradermal immunization with Tn-glycopeptides induced high levels of Th2 cytokines-even in the presence of unmethylated cytosine-phosphate-guanosine-and was associated with increased expansion of the germinal center B-cell population. Therefore, MGL acts as an efficient endocytic antigen receptor on dermal DCs in vivo, able to prime Tn-specific T- and B-cell responses. Moreover, even in the absence of adjuvant, immunization with this glycosidic Tn-based vaccine induced high levels of anti-Tn antibody responses, recognizing human tumor cells. In vivo DC-targeting strategies, based on Tn-MGL interactions, constitute a promising strategy for enhancing antigen presentation and inducing potent antibody response. (Blood. 2010;116(18):3526-3536)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据