4.7 Article

MyD88-dependent TLR4 signaling is selectively impaired in alveolar macrophages from asymptomatic HIV+ persons

期刊

BLOOD
卷 115, 期 17, 页码 3606-3615

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-10-250787

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIH R01-HL092811, R01-HL063655, K08-AI064014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alveolar macrophages (AMs) are the pre-dominant effector cell in the lungs and contribute to a critical first line of defense against bacterial pathogens through recognition by pattern recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). TLR4-mediated tumor necrosis factor alpha(TNF alpha) release is significantly impaired in HIV+ macrophages, but whether HIV impairs myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88)-dependent and/or MyD-independent TLR4 signaling pathways in human macrophages is not known. Comparing human U937 macrophages with HIV+ U1 macrophages (HIV- infected U937 subclone), the current study shows that HIV infection is associated with impaired macrophage TLR4-mediated signaling, specifically targeting the MyD88-dependent TLR4-mediated signaling pathway (reduced MyD88-interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase [IRAK] interaction, IRAK phosphorylation, nuclear factor [NF]-kappa B nuclear translocation, and TNF alpha release) while preserving the MyD88-independent TLR4-mediated signaling pathway (preserved STAT1 phosphorylation, interferon regulatory factor [IRF] nuclear translocation, and interleukin-10 [IL-10] and RANTES release). Extracellular TLR4 signaling complex was intact (similar levels of CD14 and MD2), and similar patterns of response were observed in clinically relevant AMs from healthy and asymptomatic HIV+ persons at high clinical risk of pneumonia. Taken together, these data support the concept that chronic HIV infection is associated with specific and targeted disruption of critical macrophage TLR4 signaling, which in turn may contribute to disease pathogenesis of bacterial pneumonia. (Blood. 2010;115(17):3606-3615)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据