4.7 Article

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells resident in human thymus drive natural Treg cell development

期刊

BLOOD
卷 115, 期 26, 页码 5366-5375

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-10-248260

关键词

-

资金

  1. Plan Nacional [SAF2004-01122, PLE2007-0110, BFU 2007-60990]
  2. Comunidad de Madrid [S-SAL0304-2006]
  3. Fundacion MM
  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [RECAVARD06/0014/1012]
  5. Fundacion Ramon Areces
  6. MICINN
  7. CAM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The generation of natural regulatory T cells (nTregs) is crucial for the establishment of immunologic self-tolerance and the prevention of autoimmunity. Still, the origin of nTregs and the mechanisms governing their differentiation within the thymus are poorly understood, particularly in humans. It was recently shown that conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) in human thymus were capable of inducing nTreg differentiation. However, the function of plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs), the other major subset of thymic DCs, re-mains unknown. Here we report that pDCs resident in the human thymus, when activated with CD40 ligand (CD40L) plus interleukin-3, efficiently promoted the generation of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) nTregs from autologous thymocytes. The progenitors of these nTregs were selectively found within CD4(+)CD8(+) thymocytes that had accomplished positive selection, as judged by their CD69(hi)TCR(hi) phenotype. Supporting the involvement of the CD40-CD40L pathway in pDC-induced nTreg generation, we show that positively selected CD4(+)CD8(+) progenitors specifically transcribed CD40L in vivo and up-regulated CD40L expression on T-cell receptor engagement, thereby promoting the activation of pDCs. Finally, evidence is provided that nTregs primed by pDCs displayed reciprocal interleukin-10/transforming growth factor-beta cytokine expression profiles compared with nTregs primed by cDCs. This functional diversity further supports a nonredundant tolerogenic role for thymic pDCs in the human thymus. (Blood. 2010; 115(26):5366-5375)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据