4.7 Article

BCR-ABL enhances differentiation of long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells

期刊

BLOOD
卷 115, 期 16, 页码 3185-3195

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-04-215376

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KO2155/1-1, KO2155/2-1]
  2. Thyssen Foundation [Az. 10.05.2.178]
  3. Medical Research Council [G0600782]
  4. Deutsche Carreras Leukamie-Stiftung [DJCLS R 0608v]
  5. IZKF Munster
  6. National Institute of Health [CA66996, CA118316]
  7. Medical Research Council [G0600782] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [G0600782] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a previously developed inducible transgenic mouse model of chronic myeloid leukemia, we now demonstrate that the disease is transplantable using BCR-ABL(+) Lin(-)Sca-1(+)c-kit(+) (LSK) cells. Interestingly, the phenotype is more severe when unfractionated bone marrow cells are transplanted, yet neither progenitor cells (Lin(-)Sca-1(-)c-kit(+)), nor mature granulocytes (CD11b(+)Gr-1(+)), nor potential stem cell niche cells (CD45(-)Ter119(-)) are able to transmit the disease or alter the phenotype. The phenotype is largely independent of BCR-ABL priming before transplantation. However, prolonged BCR-ABL expression abrogates the potential of LSK cells to induce full-blown disease in secondary recipients and increases the fraction of multipotent progenitor cells at the expense of long-term hematopoietic stem cells (LT-HSCs) in the bone marrow. BCR-ABL alters the expression of genes involved in proliferation, survival, and hematopoietic development, probably contributing to the reduced LT-HSC frequency within BCR-ABL(+) LSK cells. Reversion of BCR-ABL, or treatment with imatinib, eradicates mature cells, whereas leukemic stem cells persist, giving rise to relapsed chronic myeloid leukemia on reinduction of BCR-ABL, or imatinib withdrawal. Our results suggest that BCR-ABL induces differentiation of LT-HSCs and decreases their self-renewal capacity. (Blood. 2010; 115(16): 3185-3195)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据