4.7 Article

Methane and sulfate dynamics in sediments from mangrove-dominated tropical coastal lagoons, Yucatan, Mexico

期刊

BIOGEOSCIENCES
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 2981-3001

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-13-2981-2016

关键词

-

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia [4147-P T9608, 32356T]
  2. CONABIO [B019]
  3. NSF [INT 009214214]
  4. Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  5. Lieberman Fellowship
  6. Postdoctoral Research Abroad Program
  7. MOST
  8. the Ministry of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porewater profiles in sediment cores from mangrove-dominated coastal lagoons (CelestA(0)n and Chelem) on the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, reveal the widespread coexistence of dissolved methane and sulfate. This observation is interesting since dissolved methane in porewaters is typically oxidized anaerobically by sulfate. To explain the observations we used a numerical transport-reaction model that was constrained by the field observations. The model suggests that methane in the upper sediments is produced in the sulfate reduction zone at rates ranging between 0.012 and 31aEuro-mmolaEuro-m(-2)aEuro-d(-1), concurrent with sulfate reduction rates between 1.1 and 24aEuro-mmolaEuro-SO(4)(2-)aEuro-m(-2)aEuro-d(-1). These processes are supported by high organic matter content in the sediment and the use of non-competitive substrates by methanogenic microorganisms. Indeed sediment slurry incubation experiments show that non-competitive substrates such as trimethylamine (TMA) and methanol can be utilized for microbial methanogenesis at the study sites. The model also indicates that a significant fraction of methane is transported to the sulfate reduction zone from deeper zones within the sedimentary column by rising bubbles and gas dissolution. The shallow depths of methane production and the fast rising methane gas bubbles reduce the likelihood for oxidation, thereby allowing a large fraction of the methane formed in the sediments to escape to the overlying water column.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据