4.7 Article

Autoimmune cytopenia in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: prevalence, clinical associations, and prognostic significance

期刊

BLOOD
卷 116, 期 23, 页码 4771-4776

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-05-286500

关键词

-

资金

  1. Red Tematica de Investigacion Cooperativa en Cancer [RT 06/0020/002051]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science, Instituto Carlos III [FISS PI080304]
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya [2009SGR1008]
  4. CLL Global Foundation
  5. Premi Distincio Generalitat de Catalunya
  6. Instituto de Salud Carlos III

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyzed prevalence, characteristics, clinical correlates, and prognostic significance of autoimmune cytopenia in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Seventy of 960 unselected patients (7%) had autoimmune cytopenia, of whom 19 were detected at diagnosis, 3 before diagnosis, and 48 during the course of the disease. Forty-nine patients had autoimmune hemolytic anemia, 20 had immune thrombocytopenic purpura, and 1 had both conditions. A clear association was observed between autoimmune cytopenia and poor prognostic variables (ie, high blood lymphocyte count, rapid blood lymphocyte doubling time, increased serum beta-2 microglobulin level, and high expression of zeta-associated protein 70 and CD38). Nevertheless, the outcome of patients with autoimmune cytopenia as a whole was not significantly different from that of patients without this complication. Furthermore, no differences were observed according to time at which cytopenia was detected (ie, at diagnosis, during course of disease). Importantly, patients with advanced (Binet stage C) disease because of an autoimmune mechanism had a significantly better survival than patients in advanced stage related to a massive bone marrow infiltration (median survivals: 7.4 years vs 3.7 years; P = .02). These results emphasize the importance of determining the origin of cytopenia in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia for both treatment and prognostic purposes. (Blood. 2010;116(23):4771-4776)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据