4.7 Article

The status and challenge of global fire modelling

期刊

BIOGEOSCIENCES
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 3359-3375

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-13-3359-2016

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU FP7 project BACCHUS [603445]
  2. EU FP7 project LUC4C [603542]
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), through the Helmholtz Association and its research programme ATMO
  4. HGF Impulse and Networking fund
  5. Biological Resources Division of the US Geological Survey [CA 12681901,112-]
  6. US Department of Energy [LWT-6212306509]
  7. US Forest Service [PNW96-5I0 9 -2-CA]
  8. Joint Fire Science Program
  9. AXA Research Fund under the Chair Programme in Biosphere and Climate Impacts, part of the Imperial College initiative Grand Challenges in Ecosystems and the Environment
  10. National Natural Science Foundation [41475099, 2010CB951801]
  11. European Research Council [COEVOLVE 313797]
  12. National Science Foundation
  13. Carbon Mitigation Initiative
  14. Open University Research Investment Fellowship scheme
  15. NERC [NE/J010057/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  16. Natural Environment Research Council [1377877, NE/J010057/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomass burning impacts vegetation dynamics, biogeochemical cycling, atmospheric chemistry, and climate, with sometimes deleterious socio-economic impacts. Under future climate projections it is often expected that the risk of wildfires will increase. Our ability to predict the magnitude and geographic pattern of future fire impacts rests on our ability to model fire regimes, using either well-founded empirical relationships or process-based models with good predictive skill. While a large variety of models exist today, it is still unclear which type of model or degree of complexity is required to model fire adequately at regional to global scales. This is the central question underpinning the creation of the Fire Model Intercomparison Project (FireMIP), an international initiative to compare and evaluate existing global fire models against benchmark data sets for present-day and historical conditions. In this paper we review how fires have been represented in fire-enabled dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) and give an overview of the current state of the art in fire-regime modelling. We indicate which challenges still remain in global fire modelling and stress the need for a comprehensive model evaluation and outline what lessons may be learned from FireMIP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据