4.7 Article

Autochthonous Dissolved Organic Matter Drives Bacterial Community Composition during a Bloom of Filamentous Cyanobacteria

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2016.00111

关键词

Gulf of Finland; the Baltic Sea; cyanobacterial bloom; bacterial community composition; mesocosm experiments; assimilation of DOC

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [116677]
  2. Walter and Andree de Nottbeck Foundation
  3. European Social Fund [MJD 173]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dynamics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and the succession of bacterial community composition (BCC) were investigated during bloom of filamentous cyanobacteria in a mesocosm experiment conducted in the western Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea. The effects of labile dissolved organic carbon (glucose), inorganic nutrients (N and P) and large zooplankton (> 100 mu m) on the DOM pool, bacterial production and the composition of bacterial communities were analyzed over a period of 10 days. In addition, the bioavailability of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and its turnover by heterotrophic bacteria (biomass and respiration) were investigated in three 1-week bacterial bioassays. Heterotrophic bacteria rapidly utilized about 25-55% of the DOC released from the plankton community, thus assuming it to be highly labile DOC. More than half of the accumulating net DOC pool was degraded over 7 days, thus assuming it to be labile. In average, labile autochthonous DOC was degraded with bacterial growth efficiency of 25%. A distinct succession of bacterial communities accompanied the supply of autochthonous DOM, with the most prominent responses occurring in a few single phylotypes of the Delta- and Gammaproteobacterial classes. About 40% of the variation in the relative shares of dominant bacterial classes could be explained by changes in the functional groups of autotrophs. Inorganic nutrient treatment proved beneficial to Deltaproteobacteria and increased bacterial production over that of other mesocosms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据