4.7 Article

Two distinct pathways regulate platelet phosphatidylserine exposure and procoagulant function

期刊

BLOOD
卷 114, 期 3, 页码 663-666

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-200345

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Heart Foundation of Australia (Melbourne, Australia) [G 06M 2617]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (Canberra, Australia) [516725, 461221, 461219]
  3. IRIISS [361646]
  4. Australian Research Council (Canberra, Australia)
  5. Victorian Cancer Agency (Carlton, Australia)
  6. Victorian State Government OIS
  7. Cancer Council of Victoria (Carlton, Australia)
  8. Sylvia and Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation (Melbourne, Australia)
  9. Swedish Research Council (Stockholm, Sweden)
  10. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (White Plains, NY) [SCOR 7015-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Procoagulant platelets exhibit hallmark features of apoptotic cells, including membrane blebbing, microvesiculation, and phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure. Although platelets possess many wellknown apoptotic regulators, their role in regulating the procoagulant function of platelets is unclear. To clarify this, we investigated the consequence of removing the essential mediators of apoptosis, Bak and Bax, or directly inducing apoptosis with the BH3 mimetic compound ABT-737. Treatment of platelets with ABT-737 triggered PS exposure and a marked increase in thrombin generation in vitro. This increase in procoagulant function was Bak/Bax- and caspase-dependent, but it was unaffected by inhibitors of platelet activation or by chelating extracellular calcium. In contrast, agonist-induced platelet procoagulant function was unchanged in Bak(-/-) Bax(-/-) or caspase inhibitor-treated platelets, but it was completely eliminated by extracellular calcium chelators or inhibitors of platelet activation. These studies show the existence of 2 distinct pathways regulating the procoagulant function of platelets. (Blood. 2009; 114: 663-666)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据