4.7 Article

Spontaneous regression of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: clinical and biologic features of 9 cases

期刊

BLOOD
卷 114, 期 3, 页码 638-646

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-196568

关键词

-

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC), Milan
  2. Ministero dell'Universita e della Ricerca Scientifica
  3. Progetto PRIN (Programmi di ricerca di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale), Rome
  4. Ministero della Salute
  5. Progetto Oncologia, Rome
  6. Compagnia di San Paolo, Turin
  7. Italian Association against Leukemia
  8. Mediterranean Institute of Hematology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), spontaneous regressions are an exceptional phenomenon, whose biologic features are unknown. We describe 9 CLL patients who underwent a spontaneous clinical regression over an 11-year follow-up, despite a residual neoplastic clone detected by flow cytometry. CD38 and ZAP-70 were negative in all cases. Immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IgVH) genes, mutated in all 7 evaluable patients, were restricted to the VH3 family in 6, with the usage of V(H)3-30 gene in 2. The light chain variable region genes were mutated in 6 of 8 cases, with the use of V(k)4-1 gene in 3. Microarray analysis of CLL cells showed a distinctive genomic profile with an overrepresentation of BCR-related and ribosomal genes, regulators of signal transduction and transcription. The number of activated T lymphocytes expressing IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, and IL-4 was similar between CLL in spontaneous regression and healthy persons. In conclusion, spontaneous clinical regressions can occur in CLL despite the persistence of the neoplastic clone, and the biologic features include negative CD38 and ZAP-70, mutated VH3-30 and V(k)4-1 genes. The peculiar gene profile suggests that BCR signaling may play an important role in this scenario as the most significant feature of the leukemic clone in regression. (Blood. 2009; 114: 638-646)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据