4.7 Article

Regulation of human NK-cell cytokine and chemokine production by target cell recognition

期刊

BLOOD
卷 115, 期 11, 页码 2167-2176

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-08-238469

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  2. Research Council, and Cancer Society
  3. Intramural Research Program at National Institutes of Health
  4. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  5. Mary Beve's Foundation
  6. David & Astrid Hagelen's Foundation
  7. Karolinska Institute Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural killer (NK)-cell recognition of infected or neoplastic cells can induce cytotoxicity and cytokine secretion. So far, it has been difficult to assess the relative contribution of multiple NK-cell activation receptors to cytokine and chemokine production upon target cell recognition. Using Drosophila cells expressing ligands for the NK-cell receptors LFA-1, NKG2D, DNAM-1, 2B4, and CD16, we studied the minimal requirements for secretion by freshly isolated, human NK cells. Target cell stimulation induced secretion of predominately proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Release of chemokines MIP-1 alpha, MIP-1 beta, and RANTES was induced within 1 hour of stimulation, whereas release of TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma occurred later. Engagement of CD16, 2B4, or NKG2D sufficed for chemokine release, whereas induction of TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma required engagement of additional receptors. Remarkably, our results revealed that, upon target cell recognition, CD56(dim) NK cells were more prominent cytokine and chemokine producers than CD56(bright) NK cells. The present data demonstrate how specific target cell ligands dictate qualitative and temporal aspects of NK-cell cytokine and chemokine responses. Conceptually, the results point to CD56(dim) NK cells as an important source of cytokines and chemokines upon recognition of aberrant cells, producing graded responses depending on the multiplicity of activating receptors engaged. (Blood. 2010;115:2167-2176)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据