4.7 Article

DNA methylation for subtype classification and prediction of treatment outcome in patients with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

期刊

BLOOD
卷 115, 期 6, 页码 1214-1225

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-04-214668

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council for Science and Technology
  2. Swedish Cancer Foundation
  3. Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation
  4. European Community [2007-201413]
  5. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  6. Marcus Borgstrorm and Anna Maria Lundin Foundations
  7. Nordic Center of Excellence in Disease Genetics
  8. Danish Childhood Cancer Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite improvements in the prognosis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), subgroups of patients would benefit from alternative treatment approaches. Our aim was to identify genes with DNA methylation profiles that could identify such groups. We determined the methylation levels of 1320 CpG sites in regulatory regions of 416 genes in cells from 401 children diagnosed with ALL. Hierarchical clustering of 300 CpG sites distinguished between T-lineage ALL and B-cell precursor (BCP) ALL and between the main cytogenetic subtypes of BCP ALL. It also stratified patients with high hyperdiploidy and t(12;21) ALL into 2 subgroups with different probability of relapse. By using supervised learning, we constructed multivariate classifiers by external cross-validation procedures. We identified 40 genes that consistently contributed to accurate discrimination between the main subtypes of BCP ALL and gene sets that discriminated between subtypes of ALL and between ALL and controls in pairwise classification analyses. We also identified 20 individual genes with DNA methylation levels that predicted relapse of leukemia. Thus, methylation analysis should be explored as a method to improve stratification of ALL patients. The genes highlighted in our study are not enriched to specific pathways, but the gene expression levels are inversely correlated to the methylation levels. (Blood. 2010;115:1214-1225)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据