4.7 Article

Human T-cell leukemia virus type 2 produces a spliced antisense transcript encoding a protein that lacks a classic bZIP domain but still inhibits Tax2-mediated transcription

期刊

BLOOD
卷 114, 期 12, 页码 2427-2438

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-09-179879

关键词

-

资金

  1. Inserm
  2. Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon
  3. Ministere de la Recherche
  4. Croucher Foundation
  5. Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le Sida et les hepatites virales
  6. Cancer Research Society
  7. institutional Hydro-Quebec scholarship
  8. US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01-HL-62235, K24-HL-75036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and type 2 (HTLV-2) retroviruses infect T lymphocytes. The minus strand of the HTLV-1 genome encodes HBZ, a protein that could play a role in the development of leukemia in infected patients. Herein, we demonstrate that the complementary strand of the HTLV-2 genome also encodes a protein that we named APH-2 for antisense protein of HTLV-2. APH-2 mRNA is spliced, polyadenylated, and initiates in the 3'-long terminal repeat at different positions. This transcript was detected in all HTLV-2-infected cell lines and short-term culture of lymphocytes obtained from HTLV-2 African patients tested and in 4 of 15 HTLV-2-infected blood donors. The APH-2 protein is 183 amino acids long, is localized in the cell nucleus, and is detected in vivo. Despite the lack of a consensus basic leucine zipper domain, APH-2 interacts with cyclic adenosine monophosphate-response elementbinding protein (CREB) and represses Tax2-mediated transcription in Tax2-expressing cells and in cells transfected with an HTLV-2 molecular clone. Altogether, our results demonstrate the existence of an antisense strand-encoded protein in HTLV-2, which could represent an important player in the development of disorders, such as lymphocytosis, which is frequently observed in HTLV-2 patients. (Blood. 2009; 114: 2427-2438)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据