4.7 Article

CD19 targeting of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with a novel Fc-domain-engineered monoclonal antibody

期刊

BLOOD
卷 115, 期 6, 页码 1204-1213

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-229039

关键词

-

资金

  1. D. Warren Brown Foundation
  2. Specialized Center of Research from the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
  3. National Cancer Institute [P01 CA95426, P01 CA81534]
  4. American Society of Clinical Oncology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CD19 is a B cell-specific antigen expressed on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells but to date has not been effectively targeted with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. XmAb5574 is a novel engineered anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody with a modified constant fragment (Fc)-domain designed to enhance binding of Fc gamma RIIIa. Herein, we demonstrate that XmAb5574 mediates potent antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), modest direct cytotoxicity, and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis but not complement-mediated cytotoxicity against CLL cells. Interestingly, XmAb5574 mediates significantly higher ADCC compared with both the humanized anti-CD19 nonengineered antibody it is derived from and also rituximab, a therapeutic antibody widely used in the treatment of CLL. The XmAb5574-dependent ADCC is mediated by natural killer (NK) cells through a granzyme B-dependent mechanism. The NK cell mediated cytolytic and secretory function with XmAb5574 compared with the nonengineered antibody is associated with enhanced NK-cell activation, interferon production, extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation downstream of Fc gamma receptor, and no increased NK-cell apoptosis. Notably, enhanced NK cell-mediated ADCC with XmAb5574 was enhanced further by lenalidomide. These findings provide strong support for further clinical development of XmAb5574 as both a monotherapy and in combination with lenalidomide for the therapy of CLL and related CD19(+) B-cell malignancies. (Blood. 2010;115:1204-1213)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据