4.7 Article

In vivo cellular imaging pinpoints the role of reactive oxygen species in the early steps of adult hematopoietic reconstitution

期刊

BLOOD
卷 115, 期 3, 页码 443-452

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-222711

关键词

-

资金

  1. CEA
  2. La Ligue de Paris contre le Cancer [RS 07/75-20]
  3. ARC [3527]
  4. ANR [NT05-2-44232, 06-TecScan-019-04, 06-EMPB-002]
  5. Inserm
  6. CEA/DSV
  7. European Molecular Imaging Laboratories European Network of Excellence
  8. European Union [LSH-2004-503569]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Few techniques are available to characterize in vivo the early cellular dynamics of long-term reconstitution of hematopoiesis after transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) after lethal irradiation. Using a fiber-optic imaging system, we track the early steps of in vivo recruitment and proliferation of Lin(-)Sca-1(+)c-Kit(+)CD34(-) (LSKCD34(-)) HSCs highly enriched in HSCs and transplanted into lethally irradiated mice. Recruitment of the transplanted LSKCD34(-) hematopoietic cells first occurs in the femoral head and is continuous during 24 hours. Quantification of the fluorescence emitted by the transplanted hematopoietic cells shows that proliferation of LSKCD34(-) hematopoietic cells in the femoral head was potent 3 days after transplantation. Using a development of this fiber-optic imaging system, we show that the transplanted LSKCD34(-) hematopoietic cells are associated with vascularized structures as early as 5 hours after transplantation. This early association is dependent on reactive oxygen species (ROS) partly through the regulation of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression on endothelial cells and is followed by a ROS-dependent proliferation of LSKCD34(-) hematopoietic cells. This new in vivo imaging technique permits the observation of the early steps of hematopoietic reconstitution by HSCs in long bones and shows a new role of ROS in the recruitment of HSCs by bone marrow endothelial cells. (Blood. 2010; 115: 443-452)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据