4.7 Article

Nutlin-3 up-regulates the expression of Notch1 in both myeloid and lymphoid leukemic cells, as part of a negative feedback antiapoptotic mechanism

期刊

BLOOD
卷 113, 期 18, 页码 4300-4308

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-11-187708

关键词

-

资金

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC, Milan, Italy)
  2. CariFe Foundation (Ferrara, Italy)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The small molecule inhibitor of the MDM2/p53 interaction Nutlin-3 significantly upregulated the steady-state mRNAand protein levels of Notch1 in TP53(wild-type) (OCI, SKW6.4) but not in TP53(deleted) (HL-60) or TP53(mutated) (BJAB) leukemic cell lines. A direct demonstration that NOTCH1 was a transcriptional target of p53 in leukemic cells was obtained in experiments carried out with siRNA for p53. Moreover, inhibition of Notch1 expression using Notch1-specific siRNA significantly increased cytotoxicity in TP53(wild-type) leukemic cells. Of note, Nutlin-3 up-regulated Notch1 expression also in primary TP53(wild-type) B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) cells and the combined use of Nutlin-3 plus pharmacological gamma-secretase inhibitors of the Notch signaling showed a synergistic cytotoxicity in both TP53(wild-type) leukemic cell lines and primary B-CLL cells. A potential drawback of gamma-secretase inhibitors was their ability to enhance osteoclastic maturation of normal circulating preosteoclasts induced by RANKL + M-CSF. Notwithstanding, Nutlin-3 completely suppressed osteoclastogenesis irrespective of the presence of gamma-secretase inhibitors. Taken together, these data indicate that the p53-dependent up-regulation of Notch1 in response to Nutlin-3 represents an antiapoptotic feedback mechanism able to restrain the potential therapeutic efficacy of Nutlin-3 in hematologic malignancies. Therefore, therapeutic combinations of Nutlin-3 + gamma-secretase inhibitors might potentiate the cytotoxicity of Nutlin-3 in p53(wild-type) leukemic cells. (Blood. 2009; 113: 4300-4308)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据