4.7 Article

Ligand of scavenger receptor class A indirectly induces maturation of human blood dendritic cells via production of tumor necrosis factor-α

期刊

BLOOD
卷 113, 期 23, 页码 5839-5847

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-10-184796

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korean government [R13-2002-044-04001-0]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [R13-2002-044-04001-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most potent antigen-presenting cells for naive T cells. In this study, scavenger receptor class A type I and type II (SR-A) were shown to be expressed by peripheral blood DCs (PBDCs) and monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs). In addition, the binding of anti-SR-A antibody to these cells was lower in the presence of fucoidan, an SR-A agonist. Treatment of these DCs with fucoidan or anti-SR-A anti-body markedly increased the surface expression of costimulatory molecules CD83 and major histocompatibility complex class II on the CD11c(high)CD123(low) myeloid subset of PBDCs. Furthermore, fucoidan-treated PBDCs produced tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) but not IL-12p70. In addition, fucoidan-induced maturation was eliminated by pretreatment with TNF-alpha neutralizing antibody. Finally, interferon-gamma secretion and T-cell proliferation were enhanced by coculture of T cells with fucoidan-matured PBDCs. Specific inhibitors of p38 MAPK and glycogen synthase kinase 3 suppressed TNF-alpha production and maturation of fucoidan-treated PBDCs. Moreover, MDDCs lacking SR-A failed to up-regulate CD83 expression, TNF-alpha production, and phosphorylation of p38 MAPK and glycogen synthase kinase 3-beta in the presence of fucoidan. Taken together, these results suggest that ligation of SR-A leads to induction of TNF-alpha, which subsequently induces PBDC maturation, thereby leading to enhanced T-cell stimulatory capacity. (Blood. 2009; 113: 5839-5847)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据