4.7 Article

Pretargeting CD45 enhances the selective delivery of radiation to hematolymphoid tissues in nonhuman primates

期刊

BLOOD
卷 114, 期 6, 页码 1226-1235

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-210344

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lymphoma Research Foundation
  2. National Institutes of Health [PO1 CA44991, RO1 CA109663, K23 CA100394]
  3. American Society of Clinical Oncology Young Investigator Award Program
  4. Damon Runyan Cancer Research Foundation
  5. David and Patricia Giuliani, Mary and Geary Britton-Simmons, James and Sherry Raisbeck, the Wyner-Stokes Foundation
  6. Hext Family Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy (PRIT) is designed to enhance the directed delivery of radionuclides to malignant cells. Through a series of studies in 19 nonhuman primates (Macaca fascicularis), the potential therapeutic advantage of anti-CD45 PRIT was evaluated. Anti-CD45 PRIT demonstrated a significant improvement in target-to-normal organ ratios of absorbed radiation compared with directly radiolabeled bivalent antibody ( conventional radioimmunotherapy [RIT]). Radio-DOTA-biotin administered 48 hours after anti-CD45 streptavidin fusion protein (FP) [BC8(scFv)(4)SA] produced markedly lower concentrations of radiation in nontarget tissues compared with conventional RIT. PRIT generated superior target: normal organ ratios in the blood, lung, and liver (10.3:1, 18.9:1, and 9.9:1, respectively) compared with the conventional RIT controls (2.6:1, 6.4:1, and 2.9:1, respectively). The FP demonstrated superior retention in target tissues relative to comparable directly radiolabeled bivalent anti-CD45 RIT. The time point of administration of the second step radiolabeled ligand (radio-DOTA-biotin) significantly impacted the biodistribution of radioactivity in target tissues. Rapid clearance of the FP from the circulation rendered unnecessary the addition of a synthetic clearing agent in this model. These results support proceeding to anti-CD45 PRIT clinical trials for patients with both leukemia and lymphoma. (Blood. 2009; 114: 1226-1235)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据