4.7 Article

Induction of tolerance to bone marrow allografts by donor-derived host nonreactive ex vivo-induced central memory CD8 T cells

期刊

BLOOD
卷 115, 期 10, 页码 2095-2104

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-10-248716

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA-100265]
  2. Mrs E. Drake and the Gabriella Rich Center for Transplantation Biology Research
  3. M. D. Moross Institute for Cancer Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enabling engraftment of allogeneic T cell depleted bone marrow (TDBM) under reduced-intensity conditioning represents a major challenge in bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Anti-third-party cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) were previously shown to be endowed with marked ability to delete host antidonor T cells in vitro, but were found to be less effective in vivo. This could result from diminished lymph node (LN) homing caused by the prolonged activation, which induces a CD44(+)CD62L(-) effector phenotype, and thereby prevents effective colocalization with, and neutralization of, alloreactive host T cells (HTCs). In the present study, LN homing, determined by imaging, was enhanced upon culture conditions that favor the acquisition of CD44(+)CD62L(+) central memory cell (Tcm) phenotype by anti-third-party CD8(+) cells. These Tcm-like cells displayed strong proliferation and prolonged persistence in BM transplant recipients. Importantly, adoptively transferred HTCs bearing a transgenic T-cell receptor (TCR) with antidonor specificity were efficiently deleted only by donortype Tcms. All these attributes were found to be associated with improved efficacy in overcoming T cell-mediated rejection of TDBM, thereby enabling high survival rate and long-term donor chimerism, without causing graft-versus-host disease. In conclusion, anti-third-party Tcms, which home to recipient LNs and effectively delete antidonor T cells, could provide an effective and novel tool for overcoming rejection of BM allografts. (Blood. 2010; 115: 2095-2104)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据