4.7 Article

Characterization in vitro and engraftment potential in vivo of human progenitor T cells generated from hematopoietic stem cells

期刊

BLOOD
卷 114, 期 5, 页码 972-982

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-10-187013

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [HOP-83070]
  2. The Terry Fox Foundation
  3. Ontario HIV Treatment Network (OHTN)
  4. The Krembil Foundation
  5. Canada Research Chair in Developmental Immunology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

T-cell development follows a defined set of stage-specific differentiation steps. However, molecular and cellular events occurring at early stages of human T-cell development remain to be fully elucidated. To address this, human umbilical cord blood (UCB) hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) were induced to differentiate to the T lineage in OP9-DL1 cocultures. A developmental program involving a sequential and temporally discrete expression of key differentiation markers was revealed. Quantitative clonal analyses demonstrated that CD34(+)CD38(-) and CD34(+)CD38(lo) subsets of UCB contain a similarly high T-lineage progenitor frequency, whereas the frequency in CD34(+)CD38(+/hi) cells was 5-fold lower. Delta-like/Notch-induced signals increased the T-cell progenitor frequency of CD34(+)CD38(-/lo) cells differentiated on OP9-DL1, and 2 distinct progenitor subsets, CD34(+)CD45RA(+)CD7(++)CD5(-)CD1a(-) (proT1) and CD34(+)CD45RA(+)CD7(++)CD5(+)CD1a(-) (proT2), were identified and their thymus engrafting capacity was examined, with proT2 cells showing a 3-fold enhanced reconstituting capacity compared with the proT1 subset. Furthermore, in vitro generated CD34(+)CD7(++) progenitors effectively engrafted the thymus of immunodeficient mice, which was enhanced by the addition of an IL-7/IL-7 antibody complex. Taken together, the identification of T-progenitor subsets readily generated in vitro may offer important avenues to improve cellular-based immune-reconstitution approaches. (Blood. 2009; 114: 972-982)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据