4.3 Article

Real men don't hate women: Twitter rape threats and group identity

期刊

JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 80-93

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005

关键词

Trolls; Trolling; Rape threats; Computer-mediated-communication; Twitter; Identity

资金

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L008874/1]
  2. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/K002155/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. ESRC [ES/K002155/1, ES/L008874/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

On 24th July 2013, feminist campaigner Caroline Criado-Perez's petition to the Bank of England to have Elizabeth Fry's image on the UK's 5 pound note replaced with the image of another woman was successful. The petition challenged the Bank of England's original plan to replace Fry with Winston Churchill, which would have meant that no woman aside from the Queen would be represented on any UK banknote. Following this, Criado-Perez was subjected to ongoing misogynistic abuse on Twitter, a microblogging social network, including threats of rape and death. This paper investigates this increasingly prominent phenomenon of rape threats made via social networks. Specifically, we investigate the sustained period of abuse directed towards the Twitter account of feminist campaigner and journalist, Caroline Criado-Perez. We then turn our attention to the formation of online discourse communities as they respond to and participate in forms of extreme online misogyny on Twitter. We take a corpus of 76,275 tweets collected during a three month period in which the events occurred (July to September 2013), which comprises 912,901 words. We then employ an interdisciplinary approach to the analysis of language in the context of this social network. Our approach combines quantitative approaches from the fields of corpus linguistics to detect emerging discourse communities, and then qualitative approaches from discourse analysis to analyse how these communities construct their identities. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据