4.2 Article

Psychometric properties of the English Food Cravings Questionnaire-Trait-reduced (FCQ-T-r)

期刊

EATING BEHAVIORS
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 34-38

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.11.011

关键词

Food cravings; Food Cravings Questionnaire-Trait; Psychometrics; Assessment; Eating disorders; Impulsivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Food cravings have been implicated in the development and maintenance of a range of eating-and weight-related pathology. The rapid and accurate assessment of food cravings is thus critical in clinical and research settings. Existing measures of specific food cravings are often not suitable for capturing the multiple facets of the craving experience. A short version of the Food Cravings Questionnaire-Trait (FCQ-T), the mostwidely used measure of general food cravings, was recently developed in German and shown to be a one-factorial, internally reliable measure. Other recent studies validated an Italian and Spanish version of the FCQ-T-reduced (FCQ-T-r) and successfully replicated its basic psychometrics. This study sought to examine the psychometric properties of the English version of the FCQ-T-r. Undergraduate students (n = 610, 51.0% female, 53.9% white/Caucasian) completed a battery of questionnaires containing the FCQ-T-r andmeasures of specific food cravings, eating style, eating disorder symptoms, weight dissatisfaction, and impulsivity. Even though results of a confirmatory factor analysis suggested poor fit with a one-factorial model, the FCQ-T-r was found to be a one-factorial measure in both principal component and parallel analysis. The FCQ-T-r demonstrated excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .94), and scores were significantly and positively correlated with measures of specific food cravings, restrained eating, eating disorder symptoms, and impulsivity. More work is needed to confirm the factor structure of the English FCQ-T-r, but preliminary findings suggest that it constitutes a valid and reliable alternative to lengthier measures of general food cravings. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据