4.7 Article

ASB2 targets filamins A and B to proteasomal degradation

期刊

BLOOD
卷 112, 期 13, 页码 5130-5140

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-12-128744

关键词

-

资金

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  2. Universite Paul Sabatier
  3. Universite Pierre et Marie Curie
  4. National Institutes of Health [GM068600- 01]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  6. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  7. Fondation de France
  8. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  9. Ministere de la Recherche et de la Technologie

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ordered series of proliferation and differentiation from hematopoietic progenitor cells is disrupted in leukemia, resulting in arrest of differentiation at immature proliferative stages. Characterizing the molecular basis of hematopoietic differentiation is therefore important for understanding and treating disease. Retinoic acid induces expression of ankyrin repeat-containing protein with a suppressor of cytokine signaling box 2 (ASB2) in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells, and ASB2 expression inhibits growth and promotes commitment, recapitulating an early step critical for differentiation. ASB2 is the specificity subunit of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex and is proposed to exert its effects by regulating the turnover of specific proteins; however, no ASB2 substrates had been identified. Here, we report that ASB2 targets the actin-binding proteins filamin A and B for proteasomal degradation. Knockdown of endogenous ASB2 in leukemia cells delays retinoic acid-induced differentiation and filamin degradation; conversely, ASB2 expression in leukemia cells induces filamin degradation. ASB2 expression inhibits cell spreading, and this effect is recapitulated by knocking down both filamin A and filamin B. Thus, we suggest that ASB2 may regulate hematopoietic cell differentiation by modulating cell spreading and actin remodeling through targeting of filamins for degradation. (Blood. 2008; 112: 5130-5140)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据