4.7 Article

Hidden abnormalities and novel classification of t(15;17) acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) based on genomic alterations

期刊

BLOOD
卷 113, 期 8, 页码 1741-1748

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-12-130260

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH, Bethesda, MD) [5R01CA026038-30]
  2. Inger Foundation, (Greenwich, CT)
  3. Tom Collier Memorial Regatta Foundation (Los Angeles, CA)
  4. Parker Hughes Fund (Los Angeles, CA)
  5. National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan [NHRI-EX96-9434SI]
  6. Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan [MMH-E-96009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is ahematopoietic malignant disease characterized by the chromosomal translocation t(15; 17), resulting in the formation of the PML-RARA gene. Here, 47 t(15; 17) APL samples were analyzed with high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray (50-K and 250-K SNP-chips) using the new algorithm AsCNAR (allele-specific copy-number analysis using anonymous references). Copy-number-neutral loss of heterozygosity (CNN-LOH) was identified at chromosomes 10q(3 cases), 11p (3 cases), and 19q (1 case). Twenty-eight samples (60%) did not have an obvious alteration (normal-copy-number [NC] group). Nineteen samples (40%) showed either one or more genomic abnormalities: 8 samples (17%) had trisomy 8 either with or without an additional duplication, deletion, or CNN-LOH (+ 8 group); and 11 samples (23%) had genomic abnormalities without trisomy 8 (other abnormalities group). These chromosomal abnormalities were acquired somatic mutations. Interestingly, FLT3-ITD mutations (11/47 cases) occurred only in the group with no genomic alteration (NC group). Taken together, these results suggest that the pathway of development of APL differs in each group: FLT3-ITD, trisomy 8, and other genomic changes. Here, we showed for the first time hidden abnormalities and novel disease-related genomic changes in t(15; 17) APL. (Blood. 2009; 113: 1741-1748)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据