4.7 Article

Rapidly proliferating CD44hi peripheral T cells undergo apoptosis and delay posttransplantation T-cell reconstitution after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

期刊

BLOOD
卷 112, 期 12, 页码 4755-4764

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-142737

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P20 CA103694, CA33049, P20-CA103694, P01 CA033049, P30 CA008748, CA107096, R01 CA107096] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL69929, R01 HL069929] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Delayed T-cell recovery is an important complication of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). We demonstrate in murine models that donor BM-derived T cells display increased apoptosis in recipients of allogeneic BMT with or without GVHD. Although this apoptosis was associated with a loss of Bcl-2 and Bcl-X-L expression, allogeneic recipients of donor BM deficient in Fas-, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)- or Bax-, or BM-overexpressing Bcl-2 or Akt showed no decrease in apoptosis of peripheral donor-derived T cells. CD44 expression was associated with an increased percentage of BM-derived apoptotic CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. Transplantation of RAG-2-eGFP-transgenic BM revealed that proliferating eGFP(lo)CD44(hi) donor BM-derived mature T cells were more likely to undergo to apoptosis than nondivided eGFP(hi)CD44(lo) recent thymic emigrants in the periphery. Finally, experiments using carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester - labeled T cells adoptively transferred into irradiated syngeneic hosts revealed that rapid spontaneous proliferation (as opposed to slow homeostatic proliferation) and acquisition of a CD44(hi) phenotype was associated with increased apoptosis in T cells. We conclude that apoptosis of newly generated donor-derived peripheral T cells after an allogeneic BMT contributes to delayed T-cell reconstitution and is associated with CD44 expression and rapid spontaneous proliferation by donor BM-derived T cells. (Blood. 2008; 112: 4755-4764)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据