4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Phase 1/2 study of fractionated 131I-rituximab in low-grade B-cell lymphoma: the effect of prior rituximab dosing and tumor burden on subsequent radioimmunotherapy

期刊

BLOOD
卷 113, 期 7, 页码 1412-1421

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-08-175653

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0507-10049] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Cancer Research UK [C328/A2738, C431/A3313] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Department of Health Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of induction therapy with multiple doses of rituximab on the subsequent efficacy and toxicity of anti-CD20 radioimmunotherapy is unknown. We evaluated a novel protocol using 4 weekly infusions of 375 mg/m(2) rituximab followed by 2 fractions of I-131-rituximab, preceded by a 100-mg/m(2) predose of rituximab, in relapsed indolent B-cell lymphoma. Induction therapy with rituximab significantly increased the effective half-life of I-131-rituximab (P = .003) and high serum levels of rituximab after induction therapy correlated with increased effective half-life of the radioimmunoconjugate (P = .009). Patients with large tumor burdens experienced significant increases in the effective half-life of I-131-rituximab between delivery of the first and second fractions (P = .007). Induction therapy with multiple doses of rituximab did not appear to compromise the clinical efficacy or increase toxicity of subsequent I-131-rituximab radioimmunotherapy. The overall response rate was 94%, with complete response rate 50%. The median time to progression was 20 months, significantly longer than for the last qualifying chemotherapy (P = .001). Fractionation of I-131-rituximab allowed cumulative whole-body doses of more than 120 cGy, approximately 60% greater than those previously achieved with a single administration of a murine radioimmunconjugate, to be delivered without significant hematologic toxicity. (Blood. 2009; 113: 1412-1421)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据