4.6 Article

Thrombospondin 1 and cathepsin D improve prostate cancer diagnosis by avoiding potentially unnecessary prostate biopsies

期刊

BJU INTERNATIONAL
卷 123, 期 5, 页码 826-833

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bju.14540

关键词

biomarkers; thrombospondin 1; cathepsin D; prostate-specific antigen; #ProstateCancer

资金

  1. ProteoMediX

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives To investigate and further validate if two novel cancer-related glycoproteins, discovered by a genetic-guided proteomics approach, can distinguish benign disease from prostate cancer (PCa) in men with enlarged prostates. Patients and Methods A retrospective study was performed that included men with a total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration of 2.0-10 ng/mL, negative digital rectal examination and enlarged prostate (volume >= 35 mL). Serum samples were collected between 2011 and 2016 at a single centre from 474 men before they underwent prostate biopsy. Serum concentrations of thrombospondin 1 (THBS1) and cathepsin D (CTSD) glycoproteins were combined with the percentage of free PSA to total PSA ratio (%fPSA) to predict any or significant cancer at biopsy. Results The multivariable logistic regression model including THBS1, CTSD and %fPSA discriminated among biopsy-positive and biopsy-negative patients in the validation set with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.91), while %fPSA alone showed an AUC of 0.64 (P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.57-0.71). At 90% sensitivity for PCa, the specificity of the model was 62%, while %fPSA had a specificity of 23%. For high grade (Gleason score >= 7 in prostatectomy specimen) PCa, the specificity was 48% at 90% sensitivity, with an AUC of 0.83, (P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.88). Limitations of the study include the retrospective set-up and single-centre cohort. Conclusions A model combining two cancer-related glycoproteins (THBS1 and CTSD) and %fPSA can improve PCa diagnosis and may reduce the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies because of its improved specificity for PCa when compared to %fPSA alone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据