4.6 Article

High detection rate of significant prostate tumours in anterior zones using transperineal ultrasound-guided template saturation biopsy

期刊

BJU INTERNATIONAL
卷 110, 期 7, 页码 993-997

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10972.x

关键词

prostate cancer; saturation biopsy; transperineal; brachy-template

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the detection rate and the regional location of prostate cancer in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy (TTSB). PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 92 consecutive men with at least two previous negative transrectal biopsy series who underwent a multiple-core prostate TTSB at our centre were included in the study. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to address the relationship between parameters before TTSB and prostate cancer-detection rate. Covariates consisted of age at biopsy, free and total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, digital rectal examination findings, histological findings on previous biopsy, PSA velocity (PSAV), PSA-doubling time (PSADT) and the number of previous negative biopsy sets. RESULTS Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 26% of the men. A median of 30 cores was taken by TTSB. Adenocarcinoma in >2 cores was detected in 58.5% and Gleason score >= 7 was detected in 46% of the diagnosed men. Most of the tumours (83.3%) were found in the anterior zones of the gland, with a significantly higher number of positive cores vs the posterior zones (mean 4.9 vs 1.5, P = 0.015). PSADT and PSAV were the only independent predictors of prostate cancer detection at multivariate analyses with odds ratios of 0.71 (P = 0.014) and 1.58 (P = 0.025), respectively. CONCLUSIONS TTSB has a high prostate cancer-detection rate, especially in the anterior zones. Men after at least two previous negative transrectal biopsy series and persistent suspicion of prostate cancer, as evidenced by rapid PSA dynamics, should be offered TTSB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据