4.6 Article

Partial nephrectomy for selected renal cortical tumours of ≥7 cm

期刊

BJU INTERNATIONAL
卷 106, 期 10, 页码 1484-1487

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09405.x

关键词

renal cell carcinoma; partial nephrectomy; large renal tumours

资金

  1. The Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers
  2. Division of Urology of MSKCC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE To examine our institutional experience in patients treated with partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cortical tumours (RCTs) of >= 7 cm, as PN is an accepted surgical approach for appropriate RCTs of < 7 cm but there are limited data on the use of PN for larger tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS After Institutional Review Board approval, we examined our prospectively collected surgical database for patients treated with PN for RCTs of >= 7 cm between 1989 and 2008. Pertinent demographic, clinical, surgical and pathological data were reviewed. RESULTS In all, 34 patients (37 renal units) were identified for analysis with a median (interquartile range, IQR) age of 63 (52-71) years, median (IQR) tumour size of 7.5 (7.2-9.0) cm with the largest tumour being 19 cm. In 31 renal units (28 patients, 84%) carcinoma was evident, with 16 renal units (43%) having conventional clear cell carcinoma, followed by papillary in eight renal units (21%). Currently, 20 of these 28 patients (71%) are disease free, three are alive with metastatic disease (two had known preoperative metastatic disease), three died from disease and two died from other causes. The median (IQR) preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was 65 (55-73) mL/min/1.73 m2, compared with 55 (47-74) mL/min/1.73 m2 after PN (P = 0.003, paired Student's t-test). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that PN for RCTs of >= 7 cm can be safely performed and provide effective tumour control for selected patients. PN should be considered for patients with appropriate tumours, solitary kidneys or pre-existing renal insufficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据