4.6 Article

Laparoscopic renal cryoablation using ultrathin 17-gauge cryoprobes: mid-term oncological and functional results

期刊

BJU INTERNATIONAL
卷 108, 期 4, 页码 577-582

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09807.x

关键词

cryoablation; kidney; renal cancer; laparoscopy; survival

资金

  1. Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation
  2. AMC, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the surgical and functional outcomes in bilateral and unilateral nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (nsLRP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 2005 and May 2009, 457 nsLRP were performed at our clinic. In all, 250 patients underwent a bilateral nsLRP and 207 patients underwent an unilateral nsLRP. One surgeon performed all the operations. All patients presented at biopsy a localized prostate cancer. Demographic data and perioperative and postoperative measurements and outcomes were compared. RESULTS The operative times for bilateral nsLRP and unilateral nsLRP were 165 +/- 45 min and 130 +/- 25 min, respectively. The mean intra-operative blood loss was 450 +/- 300 mL and 270 +/- 160 mL in the bilateral and unilateral nsLRP groups with a transfusion rate of 3% and 1%, respectively (P = 0.013). Conversion to open surgery was never deemed necessary. Postoperatively, the mean Gleason Score after nsLRP and distribution of tumour stages was similar in the two groups, and the frequency of positive margins in both groups did not present any statistically significant difference. At 12 months, a complete continence was reported in 97% of patients who underwent a bilateral nsLRP and in 88% of patients of the unilateral nsLRP group. At that time, 69% in the bilateral nsLRP and 43% in the unilateral nsLRP groups reported the ability to engage in sexual intercourse. CONCLUSION The bilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing technique results in superior functional outcomes with regard to urinary continence and sexual potency, when compared with unilateral nsLRP, reporting similar oncological outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据