3.8 Article

Feasibility and Acceptability of Smartphone Assessment in Older Adults with Cognitive and Emotional Difficulties

期刊

JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN HUMAN SERVICES
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 209-223

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15228835.2016.1170649

关键词

Cognitive dysfunction; ecological momentary assessment; mobile technology; mood disorder; older adults

资金

  1. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine [R34 AT007064]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health at the National Institutes of Health [T32 MH019960]
  3. National Institute on Aging [R01 AG049369]
  4. Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research at Washington University Department of Psychiatry
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY & ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE [R34AT007064] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [T32MH019960] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG049369] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This feasibility study assessed perceived acceptability, adherence rates, and reasons for nonadherence to smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA). At two sites, participants (n = 103) ages 65 years or older with diagnosed anxiety or depressive disorder and cognitive concerns responded three times daily to smartphone-based EMA questions assessing clinical outcomes for two 10-day periods. Quantitative and qualitative measures followed both 10-day EMA periods. Overall, 76% of participants completed surveys on. 10 of the 20 assessment days, and 70% of participants completed at least 30% of the total surveys. Reasons for nonadherence included technical, logistical, physiological, and cognitive issues. Smartphone-based EMA is feasible in older adults with cognitive and emotional difficulties. EMA tools should be responsive to the needs and preferences of participants to ensure adequate acceptability and adherence in this population. Our findings can inform the design, development, and implementation of mobile technologies in older adults in research and clinical contexts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据