4.6 Article

Clinical significance of lymphovascular invasion in upper urinary tract urothelial cancer

期刊

BJU INTERNATIONAL
卷 102, 期 5, 页码 572-575

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07749.x

关键词

lymphovascular invasion; cancer-specific survival; upper urinary tract urothelial cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To clarify the significance of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in patients with pT3N0M0 upper urinary tract (UUT) urothelial carcinoma (UC) relative to prognosis in terms of disease-specific survival, as LVI, which implies both blood vessel and lymph vessel involvement, is reportedly a poor prognostic factor in patients with UUT-UC. The clinical records of 90 patients who had surgery for UUT-UC were reviewed retrospectively. The median patient age was 71 years and the median follow-up was 42 months. The prognostic significances of LVI (with vs without), T stage (< 1 vs 2-4), grade (1-2 vs 3), N stage (0 vs 1-2), age (<= 70 vs > 70 years), gender and tumour location (renal pelvis vs ureter) for survival time were evaluated. LVI of UUT-UC was found in 34 patients (37.8%). There were significantly higher frequencies of LVI with advancing stage and lymph node metastasis. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that LVI was strongly associated with disease-specific survival in all patients (P < 0.001) and in patients with pT3N0M0 disease (P < 0.001). Univariate analyses showed that LVI, T stage, N stage and tumour grade were significantly related to disease-specific survival in all patients (P < 0.001, < 0.001, 0.003 and 0.007, respectively). Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model showed that LVI was the only prognostic factor with independent significance for disease-specific survival (P < 0.001). LVI appears to be an important and independent prognostic factor for UUT-UC in patients treated by nephroureterectomy. Our data suggest that the LVI status might be a predictive marker for disease-specific survival in patients with T3N0M0 UTT-UC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据