期刊
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
卷 122, 期 5, 页码 720-728出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13084
关键词
Homebirth; midwifery; perinatal mortality
资金
- career grant (VENI) from ZonMw
ObjectiveTo compare rates of adverse perinatal outcomes between planned home births versus planned hospital births. DesignA nationwide cohort study. SettingThe Netherlands. PopulationLow-risk women in midwife-led care at the onset of labour. MethodsAnalysis of national registration data. Main outcome measuresIntrapartum and neonatal death, Apgar scores, and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) within 28days of birth. ResultsOf the total of 814979 women, 466112 had a planned home birth and 276958 had a planned hospital birth. For 71909 women, their planned place of birth was unknown. The combined intrapartum and neonatal death rates up to 28days after birth, including cases with discrepancies in the registration of the moment of death, were: for nulliparous women, 1.02 for planned home births versus 1.09 parts per thousand for planned hospital births, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.79-1.24; and for parous women, 0.59 parts per thousand versus 0.58 parts per thousand, aOR 1.16, 95% CI 0.87-1.55. The rates of NICU admissions and low Apgar scores did not significantly differ among nulliparous women (NICU admissions up to 28days, 3.41 parts per thousand versus 3.61 parts per thousand, aOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92-1.18). Among parous women the rates of Apgar scores below seven and NICU admissions were significantly lower among planned home births (NICU admissions up to 28days, 1.36 versus 1.95 parts per thousand, aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.93). ConclusionsWe found no increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes for planned home births among low-risk women. Our results may only apply to regions where home births are well integrated into the maternity care system.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据